How would temporal singularities leave any observable signature if they're fundamentally undetectable?

Your question touches on a genuine tension in singularity physics: if a singularity is truly undetectable, how can we claim to observe evidence for or against it?

The answer is that temporal singularities *can* leave signatures—but only indirectly, through their causal effects on the spacetime structure around them.

The Causal Structure Matters

The key insight is that a singularity's *causal character*—whether it is timelike, null, or spacelike—determines what can escape from it and what it can causally influence. [AG-2026.03-481] analyzes horizonless compact objects and shows that different singularity types produce distinct observable consequences: "photon spheres exist in Schwarzschild and JNW, but arise in JMN-1 only in the null singularity phase, establishing a direct link between causal character and null geodesic trapping." These differences produce measurable strong-field lensing and shadow signatures observable by instruments like the Event Horizon Telescope.

More fundamentally, [AG-2025.08-394] demonstrates that whether a singularity is visible to external observers depends on the timing of trapped surface formation during gravitational collapse. "The dynamics of apparent horizon governs the visibility of singularity" through the existence of outgoing null geodesics from the singularity itself. In other words: a timelike singularity might permit light rays to escape, while a spacelike one cannot. This causal difference is observable in principle.

The Detection Loophole

However, there is a real and troubling asymptote here. [AG-2026.03-104] proves that "in almost all classical spacetimes, observers cannot collect sufficient data to determine whether" the conditions for classical singularity theorems apply—or even whether a singularity exists at all. "All past singular dust FLRW spacetimes have observationally indistinguishable counterparts" that either lack a singularity or have a different causal structure.

This suggests a humbling limit: you could, in principle, measure all electromagnetic, gravitational, and particle signals reaching you and still remain unable to definitively prove that a singularity lurks in your past. The spacetime could have a singularity or not—and you might never know.

Where Observation Wins

Despite this indistinguishability in principle, specific features can narrow the gap:

• [AG-2025.05-629] shows that regular (non-singular) black holes have exactly one photon ring and produce characteristic quasinormal mode echoes, while singular black holes can have two photon rings. These are potentially distinguishable with next-generation gravitational wave detectors.

• [AG-2024.07-417] demonstrates that quantum-gravity-corrected superspinars without singularities produce "silhouettes...markedly distinct from those of black holes," offering a different observational pathway.

The pattern is clear: temporal singularities leave signatures through their boundary conditions and causal constraints, not through direct detection. We infer their presence or absence from the structure of light cones, photon orbits, and wave propagation—not from touching the singularity itself, which remains causally inaccessible.

The provided preprints don't directly address why singularities should be fundamentally undetectable, so I cannot fully resolve your premise with this archive alone.