Could anomaly detection like CATHODE discover quirk types the ML classifiers were never trained on?

Yes, anomaly detection methods like CATHODE could potentially discover quirk types the classifiers were never trained on—that's the core promise of unsupervised anomaly detection in this context.

Here's why: Traditional supervised classifiers learn to recognize *specific* signal patterns they've seen during training. CATHODE and similar methods work differently. CATHODE is described as a "model-agnostic weakly supervised anomaly search" [AG-2025.06-1325] that doesn't require you to pre-specify what new physics looks like. Instead, it learns what *background* (Standard Model) events look like, and flags anything sufficiently different.

The key insight is that anomaly detectors can be sensitive to distortions they weren't explicitly trained on. The DDD (Discriminatory Detection of Distortions) method, for instance, trains on both original and artificially modified datasets to learn what makes events anomalous in a general sense—not tied to a particular signal model [AG-2024.06-1375]. This generality is what allows discovery reach beyond the training set.

There's a practical example in quirk physics: ML-based track reconstruction can identify "oscillating trajectories of quirks" without needing traditional helical-track assumptions [AG-2024.09-1418]. The technique is explicitly "not specific to quirks," meaning it can adapt to unexpected non-standard track signatures.

That said, there are caveats. Robust anomaly detection requires training on *representative* background data [AG-2024.01-1031]—if the actual background distribution at the LHC differs from your training sample, you could miss real signals or flag false alarms. Also, choosing which anomaly detector to use for your problem is itself nontrivial [AG-2025.11-1368].

The bottom line: anomaly detection trades the precision of a targeted search for model-agnostic reach, making it well-suited for discovering quirk-like signatures you didn't anticipate—but only if your background model is trustworthy.