How much precision do you lose when training a diffusion model on Geant4 data versus running Geant4 directly?

This is a great question, but the preprints provided don't directly address the precision loss between diffusion models trained on Geant4 data versus running Geant4 directly.

What *is* in the archive: several papers show that diffusion models can reproduce Geant4-level accuracy for specific tasks (shower simulation, particle generation) [AG-2024.01-1136, AG-2025.11-1571, AG-2026.04-1383], and one explicitly frames a GAN as maintaining "high fidelity of the standard-bearer...GEANT4, at a fraction of the computational cost" [AG-2026.04-1383]. However, none quantify the precision *loss* incurred by the learning step itself—that is, how much error you introduce by training a neural net on Geant4's outputs rather than using Geant4 as your ground truth.

To properly answer your question, you'd want papers that directly compare metrics (energy resolution, shower shape distributions, etc.) between: (a) Geant4 output, (b) diffusion model trained on Geant4 data, and ideally (c) the difference attributable purely to the training process. The archive doesn't appear to contain that comparison.