Can Bayesian optimization recover if coherence fails partway through a single circuit evaluation?

Your question asks whether Bayesian optimization can gracefully degrade if quantum coherence—the delicate quantum state needed to run a circuit—collapses partway through execution. This is a fascinating edge case in hybrid quantum-classical computing.

The short answer: The provided preprints don't directly address mid-circuit coherence failure.

The archive focuses on how Bayesian optimization *adapts to noisy measurements* from completed circuits [AG-2024.06-2126, AG-2024.04-1942], how it handles hardware imperfections [AG-2024.04-1708], and how it reduces the number of quantum shots needed [AG-2024.07-1887]. These are all about *systematic errors and sampling noise*—not catastrophic loss of coherence partway through a single run.

What *does* matter here: if your circuit completes but returns a corrupted result (because coherence degraded), Bayesian optimization will treat that as a noisy observation and incorporate it into its uncertainty model [AG-2024.06-2126]. It will likely down-weight that observation and explore other regions. But a complete mid-circuit collapse—where no measurement is returned, or the circuit aborts—is outside the scope of these works, which assume you always get *some* bitstring output to work with.

To answer your question properly, you'd want preprints on circuit fault tolerance, mid-circuit readout, or active error correction during parameter sweeps—none of which appear in this subset.