Could precision tests of black hole shadows distinguish Tomimatsu–Sato from Kerr spacetimes observationally?

# Testing Tomimatsu–Sato vs Kerr with Black Hole Shadows

Yes, but the archives don't directly address Tomimatsu–Sato spacetimes specifically—they focus on a broader landscape of alternatives to Kerr. Here's what we can infer:

The Observational Threshold

The key constraint is that [future instruments like ngEHT and BHEX will distinguish alternative black holes from Kerr when image mismatches exceed 2–5%, depending on the comparison metric used AG-2025.11-110]. This provides a concrete observational target: if Tomimatsu–Sato shadows deviate from Kerr by more than that threshold, the new generation of telescopes could in principle resolve them.

The Degeneracy Problem

However, there's a serious catch. When researchers tested spacetime geometry using Sgr A*'s orbit plus shadow constraints, [they found that several geometries degenerate at the shadow level—notably Schwarzschild, Reissner-Nordström, and Bardeen regular black holes remain statistically indistinguishable even against current stellar-orbit data AG-2026.02-432]. This suggests that shadow images alone may not uniquely pin down a black hole's spacetime type, especially if Tomimatsu–Sato and Kerr shadows are similar in structure.

Breaking Degeneracies

One promising avenue: [a perturbative shadow framework shows that the energy-dependence of massive (rather than photon) shadows can disentangle different metric deformations and break degeneracies inherent in photon shadows alone AG-2025.09-773]. If Tomimatsu–Sato produces distinct massive-shadow signatures, future multiwavelength observations might distinguish it this way.

The archive does not analyze Tomimatsu–Sato shadows directly, so I cannot say whether their specific deviations fall above or below the 2–5% detectability threshold.