How does the vorticity structure affect the bubble's stability or decay timescale compared to irrotational designs?

Your question asks about how vorticity structure (organized rotational motion) changes a bubble's lifetime and stability compared to purely irrotational (non-rotating) flow. This is a sharp technical question, but the archive contains results in related but distinct domains—let me explain what's available.

Vorticity's stabilizing effect in rotating systems

The most direct insight comes from black-hole-analogue experiments. When a vortex confines perturbations, vorticity actually *reduces* instability rather than amplifying it. In an ergoregion-like scenario (where fluid velocity exceeds wave speed), vorticity diminishes the instability that would otherwise grow [AG-2024.10-601]. This suggests that organized rotational structure is stabilizing: a bubble surrounded by a structured vortex field experiences less exponential growth of surface modes than one in irrotational flow.

Vorticity as a competing mechanism for bubble decay

In realistic confined vortex systems (like a draining bathtub), the picture is more complex. When vorticity distribution is *non-singular*—meaning it has a realistic finite core rather than a singular point—the instability mechanism shifts [AG-2025.11-161]. At low circulation strength, surface instability couples directly to vorticity oscillations; at high circulation, the dominant destabilization matches black-hole-bomb behavior. This means a bubble's decay timescale depends sensitively on how strongly the vortex is wound around it.

Vortex formation during bubble collisions

When bubbles collide in strongly-coupled systems (like holographic superfluids), vortex formation introduces a *new decay channel*. Multi-bubble collisions produce vortex-antivortex pairs that subsequently annihilate [AG-2026.04-860]. Crucially, the pair lifetime scales logarithmically with proximity to a critical radius—so bubbles that collide near a threshold configuration decay much more slowly than those far from it.

For comparison, irrotational flows in the same geometry lack this topological-defect pathway entirely; a bubble in irrotational flow decays purely through viscous dissipation or wall reflection, not through vortex-pair formation.

Why this matters

Vorticity introduces competing effects: it can *suppress* some instabilities (ergoregion modes) while *opening new decay paths* (vortex reconnection, pair annihilation). A bubble embedded in a vortex-rich environment thus experiences a fundamentally different stability landscape than one in irrotational flow, with timescales that depend on collision geometry, circulation strength, and proximity to phase-transition thresholds.

---

The preprints don't directly compare bubble stability (e.g., nucleation rate or wall-thickness evolution) in rotational versus irrotational backgrounds, so a quantitative answer to your specific question isn't available here.