Could a cosmic-scale $a_0$ explain dark energy without introducing new incompatibilities in the interpolation function?

Your question asks whether a cosmic-scale fundamental acceleration $a_0$ (the characteristic acceleration scale in Modified Newtonian Dynamics, roughly $10^{-10}$ m/s²) could account for dark energy while remaining mathematically consistent—a neat idea, since $a_0$ and the dark energy density are dimensionally related.

The archive has a direct answer. [AG-2025.02-028] shows that within a Scale-Invariant Vacuum (SIV) paradigm, both the cosmological constant $Λ_E$ and the MOND acceleration $a_0$ emerge naturally from the same framework, with observed magnitudes ($a_0 ≈ 10^{-10}$ m/s², $Λ_E ≈ 1.8 × 10^{-52}$ m⁻²) falling out without fine-tuning of physical constants. This matters because it suggests the two mysteries—missing mass on galactic scales and cosmic acceleration—may share a common origin rather than being independent puzzles.

Critically, the SIV approach avoids introducing incompatibilities in the interpolation function between regimes. Rather than patching together separate models for structure and expansion, the scale-invariant formalism treats them as manifestations of a single conformal structure. The paper also proposes a novel early dark energy term ($\tilde{T}_{μν} \sim κH$) within this context, potentially addressing the Hubble tension without additional ad-hoc modifications [AG-2025.02-028].

For comparison, other models in the archive invoke quintessence fields [AG-2025.05-197, AG-2024.04-150] or scale-dependent corrections [AG-2025.11-652], but these require additional dynamical degrees of freedom. The SIV approach is more economical: it derives dark energy and $a_0$ from geometry and symmetry alone.

One caveat: the archive does not provide detailed observational tests (e.g., predictions for growth rate, weak lensing, or Integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect) that would distinguish the SIV prediction from $Λ$CDM or other models at late times.