Could differences in dynamical relaxation between cluster and galactic environments alter the acceleration regimes that RAR measurements probe?

This is an excellent question that goes to heart of how physical environments shape the measurements we use to test gravity theories.

Yes, dynamical relaxation differences between galaxies and clusters appear to materially affect what RAR measurements can probe—and this is now being studied systematically.

The core issue

In relaxed systems, particles have time to reach equilibrium velocities; in disturbed ones, they're still sloshing around. This matters because the RAR compares the *observed* acceleration (inferred from kinematics) to the *baryonic* acceleration (from stellar mass). If the environment hasn't settled, you're measuring something dynamically different [AG-2025.04-272].

Galaxy clusters, especially massive ones, are often dynamically younger than spiral galaxies—they've undergone fewer merger-free relaxation timescales. This changes the acceleration regime you're actually probing. The modified GRAS/AQUAL framework now accounts for exactly this: [AG-2026.02-201] shows that "the new field equation leads to an understanding of the difference between the galactic RAR and the RAR recently found for clusters." Rather than one universal acceleration transition, the theory now has environment-dependent behavior captured by a single free parameter.

Why this matters

The practical consequence: when you measure a RAR in a disturbed cluster, you may be sampling a non-equilibrium acceleration regime that doesn't directly compare to a relaxed galaxy's RAR. This is why cluster RAR measurements sometimes scatter more or shift—it's not just noise, it's a real physics difference [AG-2026.02-201].

However, at least one study found the opposite at lower redshift: [AG-2025.04-272] reports that "the dynamical state of galaxy clusters does not alter their fundamental relations at low redshift," though it does affect higher-order statistical moments (skewness, kurtosis). So the effect may depend on cluster mass and redshift.

Observational progress

Recent resolved-mass measurements strengthen the RAR baseline in galaxies themselves [AG-2025.04-423], which sharpens the contrast with cluster behavior—making environment effects easier to spot. And kinematic tests of alternative theories (like Refracted Gravity) on clusters show parameter tuning is needed per cluster, hinting at real environmental sensitivity [AG-2024.10-497].

The jury is still out on whether this is a fundamental feature or a measurement artifact—but the question is being taken seriously.