How does pulse-level attack difficulty scale as quantum gates become more complex or involve multiple qubits?

Your question asks about scaling difficulty in pulse-level attacks as gates become more complex—but the preprints provided address a different topic than you may have intended.

The archive does contain work on security attacks exploiting pulse-level quantum circuits [AG-2024.06-1682], which describes seven attack types (qubit plunder, timing mismatch, frequency mismatch, etc.) that manipulate the gap between high-level gate instructions and their low-level pulse implementations. However, that paper does not analyze how attack difficulty scales with gate complexity or qubit count—it focuses on vulnerability categories and defenses rather than complexity scaling.

There is separate work on how circuit complexity scales with qubit count: a comparative study shows that as evaluation qubits increase from 1 to 19, the number of two-qubit gates required scales differently depending on the hardware platform (ion traps need 2–3× fewer two-qubit gates than superconducting systems) [AG-2024.04-1598]. But this measures circuit complexity, not attack difficulty.

If you're asking whether pulse-level attacks become harder to execute as quantum gates scale up in complexity or involve more qubits, the archive does not directly answer that—you may want to clarify whether you mean (a) the computational cost to launch such an attack, (b) the success probability of manipulating pulses in larger circuits, or (c) something else entirely.