Could flavor constraints rule out particles that couple exclusively to leptons instead of quarks?

Your question is sharp and touches on a real asymmetry in how we search for new physics. The short answer: flavor constraints are generally much weaker for leptophilic particles, but they're not absent—and loop-level effects can still bite.

Here's why the asymmetry exists. Flavor-changing neutral currents (FCNCs) in the quark sector are heavily constrained by precision measurements of rare decays like K→πν or B→Xsγ; these processes are exquisitely measured and set very tight bounds on new particles that couple to quarks [AG-2024.10-1055]. But leptons? The analogous processes—like τ→μγ or μ→eγ—are much rarer in nature and harder to produce, so the indirect constraints on leptophilic mediators are genuinely relaxed [AG-2026.03-1706].

However, you can't hide entirely in the lepton sector. Even if a new particle couples only to leptons, it still corrects the decay rates of the Standard Model's electroweak bosons and Higgs boson at the loop level. When a heavy leptophilic Z′ is integrated out, virtual loops in processes like Z→ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ or h→ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ pick up corrections [AG-2026.03-1706]. These are indirect effects, but they're measurable—and with precision electroweak data, they can impose "stronger exclusion limits on the interactions of a heavy Z′" than direct searches alone [AG-2026.03-1706]. The key insight: you're trading the tight *direct* flavor bounds on quarks for weaker but still present *loop-level* constraints on leptons.

So to directly answer your question: flavor constraints alone probably cannot rule out purely leptophilic particles in the heavy mass regime (TeV and above), but precision electroweak and Higgs measurements fill much of that gap. The two methods are complementary [AG-2026.03-1706].

That said, the provided preprints don't deeply explore the theoretical space of what *kinds* of flavor structures would make a leptophilic scenario viable—that remains an open design question in model-building.