What would quantum field theory predict about negative mass that general relativity alone cannot explain?

This is a genuinely interesting question, but the archive doesn't quite address it head-on. Here's what the preprints do tell us:

What GR alone predicts about negative mass:

General relativity treats negative mass mathematically like any other mass—it curves spacetime, and objects follow geodesics. But classical GR has a stability problem: [AG-2024.07-629] shows that negative-mass "stars" are dynamically unstable under classical general relativity *alone*, without invoking quantum effects. This suggests GR itself has trouble keeping negative mass configurations from flying apart.

Where quantum field theory adds something new:

The archive hints at two genuinely quantum contributions:

1. Gravitational weak values and spacetime superposition [AG-2026.02-534]: QFT allows gravitational forces themselves to exist in quantum superposition. When you postselect a massive source in a superposed state, the probe mass feels an effective *repulsive* force mediated by negative weak values—something purely classical gravity cannot produce. This demonstrates that spacetime geometry itself can be superposed, a fundamentally QFT phenomenon.

2. Quantum pressure effects [AG-2024.03-273]: Free quantum fields develop pressure corrections (sometimes negative) when their expansion rate competes with quantum timescales like $mc^2/\hbar$. This is a genuine quantum field effect absent from classical GR; negative pressure can emerge as a purely quantum correction to energy density.

However, the archive does *not* contain a paper directly comparing what QFT predicts about negative-mass particles or fields that GR cannot—the preprints either stabilize negative mass classically, mimic it with positive mass systems, or discuss quantum gravity broadly without focusing on negative mass per se.