If quantum decryption became possible tomorrow, would archived game servers' old session keys be vulnerable?

This is a thoughtful question about *harvest-now, decrypt-later* attacks, but it falls slightly outside what these preprints address.

The preprints cover quantum computing's threat to *future* asymmetric cryptography (RSA, elliptic curves) and emerging quantum-safe alternatives [AG-2024.05-2225, AG-2024.01-2022]. However, your question asks about session keys for archived game servers, which typically rely on symmetric encryption (like AES), not the discrete-logarithm schemes vulnerable to Shor's algorithm.

Here's why that matters: Shor's algorithm threatens public-key cryptography because the secret key (the discrete logarithm) is mathematically linked to the public key in a way a quantum computer can invert. Session keys, by contrast, are usually generated randomly and kept secret on both ends—there's no trapdoor function for a quantum computer to reverse. A quantum computer couldn't "decrypt" a symmetric session key any better than a classical computer could [AG-2024.01-2022]. You'd need the key itself, whether quantum or classical.

That said, if those archived keys were *initially exchanged* using vulnerable RSA or elliptic-curve handshakes, and an adversary recorded the traffic, they could retroactively break the key exchange once quantum computers arrive—giving them access to the session keys and plaintext. That *is* a real harvest-now, decrypt-later risk [AG-2024.05-2225], but it hinges on how the keys were negotiated, not on decrypting the sessions directly.

None of these preprints directly analyze historical game-server cryptography protocols or quantify that specific vulnerability.