Antigravity Q&A
Do existing silicon detector ionization signatures rule out fractional charge particles outright?
Answered by claude-haiku-4-5 · 2 May 2026
Answer
# Silicon Detectors and Fractional Charge Searches
No — existing silicon detector signatures do not rule out fractional charge particles outright. In fact, the detectors are actively being refined to search for them.
The key insight is that fractionally charged particles leave *distinctive* ionization signatures that differ from standard particles, and this difference is a *feature*, not a bug.
What silicon detectors can see
When a fractionally charged particle (say, charge *e*/3) passes through silicon, it ionizes fewer electrons than a standard relativistic particle would, simply because ionization scales with charge [AG-2024.02-1255]. Modern ultralow-threshold silicon detectors like Skipper-CCDs can measure ionization down to individual electron-hole pairs, making them exquisitely sensitive to these reduced signals [AG-2024.12-1403]. A Skipper-CCD array has already been shown to exceed the sensitivity of *all* existing millicharged particle searches for masses below 1.5 GeV — a concrete demonstration that silicon detectors enhance rather than eliminate discovery potential [AG-2024.12-1403].
The challenge is not that fractional charges are invisible; it's that distinguishing them from backgrounds (cosmic rays, beam-induced noise) requires careful detector design and simulation.
Why the ionization spectrum matters
Recent work has shown that including collective effects in the silicon material response — the excitation of bulk plasmons — shifts the recoil ionization spectrum toward higher energies, typically peaking around 4–6 electron-hole pairs [AG-2024.02-1255]. This more accurate model helps refine what signals to expect and makes detection feasible with dedicated, well-calibrated experiments.
The current experimental landscape
Rather than ruling out fractional charges, multiple dedicated searches are now underway or proposed: LANSCE-mQ at Los Alamos [AG-2024.07-737], FORMOSA at the LHC [AG-2025.04-1532], Jefferson Lab beam-dump experiments [AG-2024.12-1403], and even repurposed Cavendish electrostatic tests [AG-2025.10-1649]. This active experimental investment reflects confidence that silicon and scintillator detectors can probe fractional charge phase space that was previously inaccessible.
Sources · 8
- 65%hep-phCollective excitations and low-energy ionization signatures of relativistic particles in silicon detectorsAG-2024.02-1255
- 60%hep-phLANSCE-mQ: Dedicated search for milli/fractionally charged particles at LANLAG-2024.07-737
- 60%hep-phFractionally Charged Particles at the Energy Frontier: The SM Gauge Group and One-Form Global SymmetryAG-2024.06-926
- 60%hep-phProbing Millicharged Particles at an Electron Beam Dump with Ultralow-Threshold SensorsAG-2024.12-1403
- 60%hep-phCavendish Tests of Millicharged ParticlesAG-2025.10-1649
- 59%hep-exInput to the ESPPU 2026 update: Searching for millicharged particles with the FORMOSA experiment at the CERN LHCAG-2025.04-1532
- 59%hep-phDirect Detection of the Millicharged BackgroundAG-2024.07-1523
- 58%hep-phSignatures of supermassive charged gravitinos in liquid scintillator detectorsAG-2024.07-696
Keep exploring
- How does the ionization signal from a charge-e/3 particle differ quantitatively from background noise in silicon?
- Why would bulk plasmon excitation at 4–6 electron-hole pairs help distinguish fractional charges from cosmic ray backgrounds?
- Could Skipper-CCDs detect millicharged particles below 1 GeV that other detector types have completely missed?
This is a research aid — not a peer review. Verify sources before citing.