How do cluster merger timescales in MOND simulations compare to observed galaxy collision rates?

Your question asks specifically about MOND simulations of cluster merger timescales. Unfortunately, the preprints provided don't contain MOND-based dynamical simulations of mergers to compare against observations.

What *is* available here:

On observed/simulated merger timescales generally: [AG-2025.04-063] characterizes galaxy merger timescales in IllustrisTNG (a standard ΛCDM hydrodynamical simulation), finding that timescales depend strongly on host halo mass and orbital parameters, with a fitting formula accurate to ~0.15 dex scatter. This provides an observational benchmark, but uses Newtonian gravity, not MOND.

On MOND and clusters: [AG-2024.10-060] discusses MOND's well-known failure in galaxy clusters, showing that MOND leaves a "residual missing mass problem" requiring an additional dark component with a specific density profile (inner core + outer steep power law). However, this paper characterizes the *static* mass distribution needed to match lensing data—it doesn't simulate cluster collision dynamics or merger timescales under MOND.

On cluster mergers more broadly: [AG-2025.04-055] and [AG-2025.05-043] analyze merger shock evolution and mass assembly histories in ΛCDM simulations, but again not MOND.

The archive does not contain MOND-based N-body or hydrodynamical simulations that directly address whether cluster merger timescales differ under MOND dynamics compared to observations—that gap would need to be filled by new work.