How do loop corrections from leptophilic particles differ in strength compared to tree-level quark couplings?

This is a thoughtful question about quantum corrections in beyond-Standard-Model physics, but the preprints provided don't directly address the comparison you're asking about.

The closest relevant work concerns leptoquarks (which couple leptons and quarks together). [AG-2024.08-1059] studies radiative corrections to leptoquark-mediated processes and finds that loop corrections can be absorbed into running couplings—specifically, that high-energy leptoquark couplings are *systematically weaker* than their low-energy counterparts when properly evolved. However, this paper doesn't explicitly compare loop-correction *strengths* between leptophilic particles and tree-level quark processes in a head-to-head way.

More generally, the archive does contain several studies of loop effects in precision physics. [AG-2025.03-1775] shows that one-loop corrections can substantially improve sensitivity to new physics in lepton-number-violating processes, and [AG-2024.02-986] finds that loop contributions to charged-current processes involving quarks and leptons can be competitive with tree-level constraints. [AG-2026.04-1240] demonstrates that two-loop corrections alter mixing patterns in effective field theory, sometimes substantially.

But none of these directly quantify how the *magnitude* of loop corrections from leptophilic new particles compares to tree-level quark couplings—your specific question appears to fall outside the scope of these preprints.