Have automated data analysis pipelines improved quasar identification accuracy significantly?

I appreciate the question, but the provided preprints don't address quasar identification accuracy. The archive materials cover gravitational wave detection pipelines, particle physics simulation, and one quasar study—but that one focuses on light-curve classification from the Zwicky Transient Facility rather than automated spectral pipelines for quasar identification broadly.

That said, I can note what *is* in the archive: Two papers do touch quasar work. [AG-2025.05-022] describes active learning to improve QuasarNET, a convolutional neural network used in DESI's spectral classification pipeline—achieving equal or better completeness and purity than previous weights with one-tenth the training data. [AG-2025.02-222] reports that machine learning on ZTF light curves identified 4.8 million quasars at 97% F1 score, outperforming static-image surveys like Pan-STARRS. These suggest automated pipelines *are* improving accuracy, but a focused answer to your question would require preprints surveying the historical trajectory of quasar identification methods.