Would quantum computers struggle to simulate classical systems like fluid dynamics without quantum entanglement?

Your question touches on a subtle but important distinction: entanglement itself isn't the limiting factor for quantum simulation of classical fluids—the real bottleneck is whether quantum computers can exploit their advantages at all for these fundamentally nonlinear problems.

Here's what the research shows:

Entanglement Isn't the Core Issue

Entanglement is a resource quantum computers *can* use, but the more fundamental challenge is that fluid dynamics equations are nonlinear (the velocity field couples back on itself). Linear systems—where entanglement naturally helps—are much easier for quantum computers. When researchers have successfully simulated classical fluids on quantum hardware, they've typically relied on hybrid approaches that shift the nonlinear work to classical processors [AG-2024.06-1438, AG-2024.06-2213].

For instance, one team demonstrated high-fidelity Navier-Stokes solutions by having a classical computer handle nonlinear terms while a quantum processor solved the linear pressure equation using variational methods [AG-2024.06-1438]. This isn't about entanglement shortage—it's about pragmatically using each machine for what it does well.

The Real Limitation: Scalability Without Exponential Advantage

A more sobering finding is that even with quantum approaches, the hoped-for exponential speedup may not materialize. One detailed analysis of drag-force calculations found that quantum algorithms based on Carleman linearization of the lattice Boltzmann method would require between 10²¹ and 10³⁹ logical gates—a prohibitive cost—while showing only modest polynomial speedup over classical algorithms, not exponential [AG-2024.06-1704]. The culprit: time-stepping scales unavoidably with grid resolution in nonlinear problems.

What *Has* Worked

Recent experiments show quantum computers can simulate simple, idealized flows reasonably well: a superconducting processor with ten qubits reproduced the temporal evolution of a 2D decaying vortex and diverging flow with 99.97% gate fidelity [AG-2024.04-2162]. Another team achieved under 0.2% error simulating Poiseuille flow and solved a 5043-dimensional matrix on real hardware using hybrid quantum-classical iteration [AG-2024.06-1687].

Bottom line: Quantum computers don't struggle because they lack entanglement for fluid-dynamics problems—they struggle because those problems are nonlinear and high-dimensional in ways that don't align with quantum speedup mechanisms, at least not without fault-tolerant error correction that remains years away.