How does the asymmetry change if thrust measurements can register both positive and negative values symmetrically around zero?

Your question asks about how an asymmetry—presumably in some measurement or physical system—changes when thrust data can flip sign symmetrically around zero, rather than staying positive (or negative) by default.

The preprints provided focus on quantum sensing, gravitational waves, and optomechanical measurement techniques, but none directly address thrust measurement asymmetry or how bidirectional (positive/negative) signal registration alters it.

However, two papers touch on related symmetry concepts that may offer some insight:

Breaking reciprocal symmetry in sensors: [AG-2024.03-1829] shows that nonreciprocal systems—ones where forward and backward responses differ—can be deliberately engineered to enhance sensitivity. The key idea is that *asymmetry itself can be a resource*. If a system had a directional bias (asymmetric thrust response), allowing it to measure equally in both directions might seem to erase that advantage. But the paper suggests that the asymmetry in *how* the system responds, rather than the sign of the output, is what matters for sensitivity gain.

Symmetry of measurements and current generation: [AG-2024.05-1873] shows that breaking inversion symmetry (the symmetry between opposite directions) is sufficient to generate motion from measurement alone. Crucially, the magnitude of the effect depends on whether time-reversal symmetry is also broken. A fully symmetric measurement (registering +1 and −1 equally) could, paradoxically, preserve more of an asymmetric effect if the underlying asymmetry is in the *timing* or *operator structure* rather than in the sign of the output.

Your archive does not contain papers specifically analyzing how bidirectional thrust measurement cancels or preserves directional asymmetries in propulsion contexts. A more direct answer would need work on thrust vectoring, measurement bias, or EMdrive/reactionless-drive asymmetry.