Could modified gravity theories produce the same gravitational potential depth as dark matter models through different spacetime geometries?

# Modified Gravity and Gravitational Potential Depth

Yes, modified gravity theories can in principle produce gravitational potential shapes equivalent to dark matter models, but whether they do so *through the same spacetime geometry* is a subtle and testable question.

The Core Idea

In General Relativity, dark matter is treated as invisible matter that curves spacetime according to Einstein's equations. Modified gravity theories take a different approach: they change the rules by which matter curves spacetime, or introduce new geometric degrees of freedom. The result can be identical *effective* gravitational potentials even though the underlying geometry differs.

For example, conformal gravity predicts an extra "linear potential" term in addition to the Newtonian potential [AG-2025.06-260]. This additional term arises not from unseen mass, but from a reformulation of gravitational theory itself. Similarly, energy-momentum squared gravity—where the squared stress-energy tensor couples to the metric—can produce flat galaxy rotation curves by geometric modification alone [AG-2025.01-706].

The Matching Problem

The crucial issue is that different theories predict *different* relationships between geometry and matter. In General Relativity, the Weyl potential (the combination of spatial and temporal metric distortions) evolves together with matter density fluctuations. In many modified gravity theories, this lockstep relationship breaks down [AG-2025.06-066].

This creates an observational handle: if you measure both how galaxy clusters grow and how the Weyl potential evolves, a mismatch reveals modified gravity. Conversely, dark matter models typically preserve the GR relationship. Current cosmological data constrain any mismatch to within 33% from early times to the present [AG-2025.06-066], suggesting that if modified gravity is at play, it must mimic GR's geometry-matter coupling quite closely.

The Degeneracy Challenge

There's a complication: models with dark matter that has extra interactions (a "dark fifth force") can produce the same observable signatures as certain modified gravity theories [AG-2024.04-266]. Breaking this degeneracy requires additional measurements, such as gravitational redshift data from next-generation surveys like the Square Kilometre Array.

Local vs. Cosmological Consistency

A central finding is that modified gravity models struggle to satisfy constraints *across both scales* simultaneously. Some geometric theories (like teleparallel and symmetric teleparallel extensions) can reproduce cosmic acceleration, but they often violate Solar System precision tests—notably deviations in light bending (the Eddington parameter) [AG-2025.11-174]. This suggests that a single modified geometry cannot easily replicate dark matter's behavior everywhere.

Bottom line: Modified gravity can mimic dark matter's gravitational effects locally, but the geometry must differ globally in measurable ways. Testing this requires combining galactic observations, cosmological surveys, and precision tests across many scales.