Why do leptophilic couplings leave larger loop imprints in Z decays than in B physics?

This is a sharp question, but the provided preprints don't directly address the comparative sensitivity of Z decays versus B physics to leptophilic loop corrections.

What we *can* extract: Leptophilic new physics (particles coupling preferentially to leptons) leaves loop-level imprints in both Z and B decays. In Z decays, a leptophilic Z′ can correct leptonic Z branching ratios at loop level [AG-2026.03-1706], and these corrections are relatively clean to measure because they modify precision electroweak observables at the Z-pole with minimal hadronic uncertainty [AG-2025.04-1493]. By contrast, B decays involve hadronization and QCD dynamics that complicate loop signatures: even when leptoquarks (which couple leptons and quarks) contribute at loop level to B decays, their effects must be extracted through FCNC constraints and are entangled with strong-interaction uncertainties [AG-2025.11-1220].

The intuition is likely that Z decays are "cleaner" — you measure electrons and muons with high precision — while B decays require disentangling quark loops from QCD background. But the archive doesn't contain a direct analysis comparing loop sensitivity ratios between the two processes.