Could scalar-tensor theories with different coupling constants evade the general relativity suppression entirely?

Your question asks a deep one: whether varying the coupling constant in scalar-tensor gravity could allow them to *completely* bypass the GR limit, rather than just produce small deviations.

The short answer is: no, the archive shows that requiring certain GR solutions to exist *constrains* the available coupling space dramatically, and screening mechanisms further suppress deviations.

The coupling constant bottleneck

In scalar-tensor theories, the coupling strength between the scalar field and spacetime curvature normally controls how far the theory deviates from GR. You might naively expect that fine-tuning this coupling could dial up modifications arbitrarily. But [AG-2025.03-085] reveals a fundamental tension: if you *require* that standard GR solutions like Schwarzschild spacetime or de Sitter solutions should exist as exact solutions in your theory, you drastically restrict the allowed coupling functions. The covariant analysis shows that stealth solutions (where the metric looks exactly like GR while a non-trivial scalar field hides underneath) *prevent* the theory from having the freedom to deviate substantially in other regimes. In other words, compatibility with observed black holes locks in much of the coupling structure.

Screening mechanisms enforce GR locally

Even if you could choose a different coupling constant, [AG-2024.07-236] demonstrates that screening mechanisms—which suppress fifth forces in high-density regions—create a spatially-dependent gravitational constant. This means that in the lab, on Earth, or even around stellar objects, the fifth-force modifications are actively *hidden* by the environment itself. The coupling strength becomes irrelevant where we can measure it most precisely.

Narrow windows, not escape routes

The only hint of a loophole appears in [AG-2025.05-311], which notes that scalarization can occur in a "narrow window of masses" for supermassive black holes while leaving lighter sources unaffected. But this is not an evasion of GR suppression—it is a *mass-dependent* suppression that still respects existing gravitational-wave constraints. You cannot simply choose a coupling to avoid it; the coupling is already constrained by LIGO/VIRGO data.

Bottom line: Different coupling constants do not open an escape hatch. Instead, the requirement that GR solutions exist, combined with screening effects and observational constraints, forms a bottleneck that keeps scalar-tensor theories close to GR wherever we can test them.