Can apsidal precession measurements in tight binaries definitively rule out AQUAL's implicit orbital timescale assumptions?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

Can Apsidal Precession Rule Out AQUAL's Timescale Assumptions? Not definitively — at least not yet from the preprints provided. Here's why the question is subtle: What AQUAL Predicts About Orbits AQUAL (A QUAdratic Lagrangian formulation of MOND) and related modified gravity theories predict apsidal precession — a shift in the orientation of an elliptical orbit's major axis — in weak gravitational regimes where MOND effects dominate [AG 2024.10 033]. This is genuinely distinctive: Newtonian gravity produces non precessing ellipses in two body systems, so detecting precession would be a smoking gun for modified gravity. The Measurement Challenge The elegant proposal is to use eclipsing binaries at kiloparsec distances to achieve Solar System–like acceleration precision while avoiding the "external field effect" (a loophole in MOND that can disable its predictions inside galaxies) [AG 2024.10 033]. However, the provided preprints don't report actual apsidal precession detections in tight binaries — they focus on wide binaries and galactic kinematics. The Broader Constraint Picture What does emerge is tension. AQUAL and QUMOND formulations struggle to simultaneously satisfy three constraints: galactic rotation curves (the Radial Acceleration Relation), the Solar System's measured quadrupole, and wide binary kinematics [AG 2024.01 118]. The sharpness of the transition between MOND and Newtonian regimes required by Solar System measurements is 8.7σ incompatible with what galactic data prefer. This doesn't directly rule out AQUAL's orbital timescale assumptions — those concern how quickly apsidal precession accumulates. But it suggests AQUAL as formulated may not be self consistent across scales. The Bottom Line Apsidal precession in tight binaries is a theoretically powerful discriminator, but the archive doesn't contain observational results that use it to test AQUAL's specific timescale predictions.