Would the bullet's material composition change which force—aerodynamic or relativistic—dominates first?

Your question assumes a scenario (a bullet approaching relativistic speeds) that the provided preprints don't address. None of these papers discuss how a projectile's material composition would affect the relative dominance of aerodynamic drag versus relativistic effects as velocity increases.

That said, I can sketch the physics, even though it's not in the archive:

Aerodynamic drag depends on the bullet's cross-sectional area, shape, and the density of the medium it travels through. At subsonic and supersonic speeds in air, drag force scales roughly with velocity squared and is mediated by classical fluid dynamics—it doesn't care much whether your bullet is made of lead, steel, or aluminum (though density affects momentum and deformation).

Relativistic effects (like time dilation or length contraction of the bullet in its rest frame) become relevant at speeds approaching *c*, and they're independent of material composition—they're pure geometry of spacetime. What *does* depend on composition is how the bullet interacts with the quantum vacuum and radiation fields at extreme velocities. For instance, [AG-2025.12-195] discusses how even small interstellar particles impart "massive energy at relativistic speeds," and mentions the Schwinger limit—a threshold where the electromagnetic field becomes strong enough to create particle–antiparticle pairs. A denser, more tightly-bound material might resist this breakdown differently than a loosely-structured one, but that's speculative.

The honest answer: material composition probably affects *how quickly* the bullet breaks apart or loses coherence at relativistic speeds, but not which force "dominates first" in any clear sense—both regimes merge into exotic quantum-field and plasma physics long before classical aerodynamics matters.