Does OmniCosmos's cross-domain learning require retraining on new data, or does transfer happen at inference?

Your question asks whether OmniCosmos requires retraining when applied to new domains, or whether knowledge transfer happens at inference time alone. The provided preprints don't directly address OmniCosmos's inference mechanics.

However, I can clarify what the papers *do* tell us about how these foundation models work in practice:

OmniCosmos uses a pre-trained foundation model (called OmniLearned) developed on collider physics data, then applies it to cosmology and other domains [AG-2025.12-1947]. The transfer appears to involve fine-tuning on target-domain data, not pure inference—this is the standard paradigm in foundation model research.

The closest parallel in your archive is the neutrino physics work [AG-2026.04-1164], which shows that OmniLearned models pre-trained on collider data outperform from-scratch training on neutrino experiments across "the same number of training steps"—implying fine-tuning does occur, but requires *fewer* training examples and iterations than training from scratch.

A clearer example comes from the calorimeter simulation work [AG-2025.11-1571]: transfer learning with "only 100 target-domain samples" achieves 44% improvement over training from scratch, using "parameter-efficient fine-tuning with bias-only adaptation"—updating just 17% of model parameters rather than the whole network.

Bottom line: These models don't work at pure inference; they require some retraining/fine-tuning on new data. But that fine-tuning is *much cheaper* than training from scratch, because the pre-trained weights already encode useful structure.

The abstracts don't explain OmniCosmos's specific fine-tuning procedure or whether it uses parameter-efficient methods like bias-only updates.