What if you retrained the surrogate on mixed geometry configurations—would it generalize better than single-parameter optimization?

Your question assumes a technical context—surrogate model training on mixed geometries versus single parameters—that doesn't map cleanly onto the preprints provided. Let me explain what's in the archive and where the gap is.

The archive contains several papers on surrogate-based optimization for quantum circuits and networks [AG-2024.07-2351, AG-2024.04-1499], where machine learning models stand in for expensive quantum simulations or circuit evaluations. These surrogates are trained to predict performance or landscape properties, then used to guide the search for good parameters more efficiently than brute-force methods.

However, none of these papers directly address your specific question: whether training a surrogate on diverse ("mixed") geometry configurations improves generalization compared to optimizing a single geometric parameter.

The closest relevant work is [AG-2024.07-2231], which trains a learned optimizer (L2O-$g^{\dagger}$) on a single generic problem instance and demonstrates "strong out-of-distribution generalization" to new VQA problems. This suggests that a well-designed surrogate *can* generalize beyond its training regime—but the paper doesn't compare single-parameter versus multi-geometry training strategies head-to-head.

Similarly, [AG-2024.02-1717] shows that QAOA landscapes can have many poor local minima even with logarithmically scaled parameters, which hints that initialization and landscape structure matter for optimization, but again doesn't directly test surrogate generalization across mixed geometries.

The archive doesn't contain a direct empirical or theoretical comparison of surrogate generalization under single-parameter versus mixed-geometry training regimes.