How do Weyl-coupled and conformal gravity predictions diverge on galaxy cluster scales?

This is a sophisticated question about how different modified gravity theories make divergent predictions at galaxy cluster scales. Let me map out the key distinctions using the archive.

The Core Divide

The fundamental disagreement centers on what governs the relationship between matter density and spacetime geometry—particularly the Weyl potential, which encodes the curvature of space and time.

In general relativity, matter density growth and Weyl potential evolution are locked together by a single growth function [AG-2025.06-066]. This is what makes GR predictively tight: measure one, you know the other.

Weyl-coupled theories (and conformal gravity variants) break this coupling. Conformal gravity introduces an additional linear potential term in the non-relativistic limit, characterized by a parameter γ*, that acts alongside the ordinary Newtonian potential [AG-2025.06-260]. This extra term mimics dark matter effects without requiring dark matter particles—a key selling point for the theory.

What Galaxy Clusters Reveal

Galaxy clusters are the perfect testing ground because they're massive enough that relativistic effects matter, yet close enough to observe in detail.

Conformal gravity's prediction: On cluster scales, the linear potential becomes significant, so the effective gravitational potential departs from what GR + dark matter would predict. When you measure velocity dispersions in elliptical galaxies within clusters (a direct probe of the gravitational potential), conformal gravity should leave a signature [AG-2025.06-260].

Weyl-coupled theories' prediction: If geometry decouples from matter density, the Weyl potential grows *differently* than density perturbations do. You can detect this by cross-correlating weak lensing (which probes the Weyl potential directly) with galaxy clustering (which traces matter density) [AG-2025.06-066]. The two growth rates should diverge in non-GR theories.

What Observations Show (So Far)

Here's where it gets interesting: current cluster data are not showing the predicted divergences.

For Weyl-coupled theories, a new test combining lensing and clustering finds the Weyl potential tracks density growth to within 33% from z=10 to z≈0.5, with no evidence for deviation from GR [AG-2025.06-066]. This is a tight constraint.

For conformal gravity tested on clusters, the results are mixed. A disformal coupling model (a variant that modifies Poisson's equation) examined 19 CLASH galaxy clusters and found the coupling length must be extremely small—consistent with GR, with upper limits around 100 kpc at 1σ [AG-2024.12-570]. Another modified gravity theory, "Refracted Gravity," fits cluster kinematics as well as GR but *requires different parameters for each cluster*, undermining its universality claim [AG-2024.10-497].

Why This Matters

If either Weyl-coupled or conformal gravity were correct, clusters should be the smoking gun. Their high density makes gravitational effects obvious. The fact that both frameworks are being *constrained to match GR* suggests either: (1) these alternatives are ruled out, or (2) the real effects are smaller than current precision can detect, or (3) we need higher-redshift data (where growth rates differ more dramatically) [AG-2026.04-1538].

The preprints don't directly compare Weyl-coupled and conformal gravity side-by-side on identical cluster datasets, so the detailed mathematical divergence between their predictions on cluster scales isn't fully spelled out here.