What physical constraints does Sledgehamr enforce to prevent negative densities across refinement boundaries?

I appreciate the question, but the preprints provided don't address Sledgehamr's constraint-enforcement mechanisms in detail.

The archive contains one paper on Sledgehamr [AG-2024.04-069], which describes it as an adaptive mesh refinement code for scalar fields compatible with GPU and CPU clusters, but the abstract doesn't discuss specific methods for preventing negative densities at refinement boundaries.

The other preprints focus on constraint-preserving numerical schemes for *general relativistic hydrodynamics* and wave equations (using discontinuous Galerkin and flux-reconstruction methods), which employ techniques like convex invariant regions, geometric quasi-linearization, and oscillation-elimination — but these are applied to different codes (ExaHyPE, ExaGRyPE) and different physics systems, not to Sledgehamr's scalar field dynamics.

To get a detailed technical answer, you'd need either Sledgehamr's full methodology paper or its documentation; the abstract provided here doesn't go into that level of implementation detail.