Can antimatter propulsion theoretically overcome the energy-conversion losses in current rocket designs?

Antimatter propulsion is theoretically tantalizing because matter–antimatter annihilation releases energy with near-perfect conversion: a gram of antimatter meeting a gram of matter yields roughly the energy of the Hiroshima bomb. In principle, this dwarfs chemical rockets, where combustion wastes most energy as heat rather than directed thrust.

However, the preprints provided don't directly address antimatter propulsion efficiency or energy-conversion losses in rocket designs. The archive includes work on antimatter's gravitational properties [AG-2025.04-1363], experiments manipulating antimatter at CERN [AG-2024.01-1439], and exotic speculative physics around antimatter propagation [AG-2026.04-1511]—but none tackles the engineering question of whether antimatter reactors could overcome losses inherent in current rocket nozzles, turbopumps, and thermal constraints.

To properly answer your question, we'd need papers on antimatter engine concepts (annihilation rate, containment losses, exhaust velocity, specific impulse), comparative analyses with chemical/nuclear designs, or constraints from magnetic confinement of antimatter in flight. The archive as listed doesn't cover those topics.