Antigravity Q&A
Why does thermal noise dominate LIGO's budget while shot noise limits LISA, changing where squeezing helps most?
Answered by claude-haiku-4-5 · 29 May 2026
Answer
The fundamental reason lies in how these two detectors couple to their noise sources and how their noise scales with frequency.
LIGO's thermal noise problem:
LIGO operates as a kilometer-scale ground-based interferometer. Its test masses—the mirrors that measure gravitational waves—are suspended and free to move. At low frequencies (below ~100 Hz), thermal vibrations of the suspension system and the mirrors themselves dominate the noise budget [AG-2024.04-408]. This thermal noise is *classical* and independent of the quantum properties of light; it comes from random jiggling of atoms in the optics and suspension. Thermal noise couples equally at all frequencies and doesn't decrease with higher laser power, so it sets a fundamental floor on sensitivity below certain frequencies.
LISA's shot noise limitation:
LISA, by contrast, operates in space where thermal noise is negligible. As a laser interferometer that measures distance changes via photon counting, LISA's sensitivity is limited by *shot noise*—the quantum fluctuations in the number of photons received at the detector [AG-2025.09-387]. Shot noise decreases when you use more photons, but LISA operates at millihertz frequencies where thermal effects vanish and the photon-counting noise becomes the binding constraint [AG-2026.01-520].
Where squeezing helps:
Squeezing—a quantum state of light that trades uncertainty in one variable for another—addresses *quantum* noise (shot noise and radiation pressure noise), not classical thermal noise [AG-2024.04-408]. For LIGO, squeezing reduces quantum noise below the Standard Quantum Limit, but only in frequency bands where quantum noise competes with thermal noise; below ~10 Hz, thermal noise is so dominant that squeezing provides limited benefit [AG-2024.04-408]. For LISA, which has no competing thermal noise across its band, broadband quantum-noise suppression via frequency-dependent squeezing delivers sensitivity gains across the entire millihertz band [AG-2024.01-1430].
In essence: LIGO fights a classical demon (atoms vibrating), so quantum tricks help but don't solve the core problem. LISA fights a quantum demon (photon counting), so quantum engineering like squeezing is directly addressing its fundamental limit.
Sources · 8
- 68%gr-qcSqueezing the quantum noise of a gravitational-wave detector below the standard quantum limitAG-2024.04-408
- 61%gr-qcFundamental Noise and Gravitational-Wave Sensitivity of the Laser Interferometer Lunar Antenna (LILA)AG-2025.08-498
- 60%gr-qcFundamental Limits of Quantum Sensors for Gravitational Wave DetectionAG-2026.03-158
- 60%gr-qcLeveraging Time-Dependent Instrumental Noise for LISA SGWB AnalysisAG-2024.08-021
- 59%gr-qcImportance of Shot Noise in the Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background with Next Generation DetectorsAG-2025.09-387
- 59%quant-phFrequency-dependent squeezing for gravitational-wave detection through quantum teleportationAG-2024.01-1430
- 59%gr-qcEffect of noise characterization on the detection of mHz stochastic gravitational wavesAG-2026.01-520
- 59%quant-phTrue and apparent motion of optomechanical resonators, with applications to feedback cooling of gravitational wave detector test massesAG-2024.08-416
Keep exploring
- How does LIGO's suspension system's thermal noise compare quantitatively to its mirror thermal noise below 10 Hz?
- Could LISA's shot noise be reduced by simply increasing laser power without hitting other constraints?
- Why doesn't frequency-dependent squeezing help LIGO at sub-10 Hz frequencies where thermal noise dominates?
This is a research aid — not a peer review. Verify sources before citing.