If quantum superposition creates repulsive gravity, would it only work on microscopic objects?

Your question asks whether quantum superposition–induced repulsion would be limited to microscopic scales. The answer depends on what mechanism you're asking about, and the preprints clarify some surprising nuances.

Two Different Mechanisms

The archive describes two distinct scenarios where quantum superposition and gravity interact:

1. Repulsion via postselection (microscopic, fundamental):

When a source mass is prepared in a spatial superposition and then postselected—meaning you condition on measuring it in a specific location—a probe mass nearby experiences a net repulsive force [AG-2026.02-534, AG-2026.02-268]. This is a genuine quantum interference effect: gravity from the two superposed positions of the source interferes constructively to push the probe away. Crucially, this effect requires quantum measurements and postselection, so it's not a classical repulsion that scales up. A proposed experiment uses nanocrystals with embedded spins [AG-2026.02-534].

2. Repulsion from quantum field fluctuations (scale-independent, but tiny):

At the Planck scale, quantum gravity itself—not the superposition measurement—can exhibit repulsive character in certain regimes near black holes [AG-2024.12-507]. Separately, quantum vacuum fluctuations in linearized gravity can induce a repulsive force between objects with different gravitoelectric and gravitomagnetic polarizability [AG-2025.01-366], with a distance dependence of $r^{-8}$ to $r^{-11}$.

Why Microscopic?

The postselection-based repulsion (mechanism 1) doesn't have a built-in size limit—it's fundamentally about quantum interference, which works at any scale. However, for the effect to be observable and useful experimentally, you need [AG-2026.02-268]:

• Small enough masses that quantum coherence can be maintained (nanocrystals)
• Careful control of the superposition and measurement
• Sufficient spatial separation of superposed states

Scaling this up to macroscopic objects would require maintaining quantum coherence over larger distances and times—a formidable decoherence problem. The vacuum-fluctuation repulsion (mechanism 2) is scale-independent in principle but becomes vanishingly small at everyday scales because it falls off as $r^{-8}$ or worse.

Bottom line: The postselection effect is not inherently limited to microscopic objects by the physics, but practical decoherence constraints make large-scale demonstrations infeasible with current technology.