How do Tomimatsu–Sato solutions differ physically from Kerr black holes in observable ways?

I appreciate the question, but I need to be direct: none of these preprints discuss Tomimatsu–Sato solutions specifically, so I cannot answer your question from this archive.

The Tomimatsu–Sato family are exact solutions to Einstein's equations describing rotating, uncharged black holes with a specific structure in their multipole moments — they're distinct from Kerr solutions in how they distribute their angular momentum. The preprints here focus on Kerr black holes, quantum corrections to Kerr geometry, toroidal black holes, superspinars, and alternatives like black mirrors, but none directly address Tomimatsu–Sato physics or how it observably differs from Kerr.

To get a proper answer to your question, you'd want papers that either derive Tomimatsu–Sato solutions explicitly and compare their geodesics/observables to Kerr, or that discuss multipole structure differences in rotating black holes more broadly.