Does infrared sensitivity explain why angular correlations fail across all kinematic regions, or only near soft-collinear limits?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

Your question asks whether infrared (IR) sensitivity—the vulnerability of calculations to soft and collinear divergences—explains failures in angular correlation predictions *everywhere*, or only in restricted kinematic regions (soft-collinear limits).

The archive evidence points to region-dependent answers: IR sensitivity explains failures *primarily* in soft-collinear corners, but angular correlations face distinct challenges across broader kinematic space.

IR sensitivity in soft-collinear limits

IR divergences are indeed most acute near soft-collinear thresholds. [AG-2025.12-1699] explicitly studies "the infrared (IR) behavior of both small-angle EECs" and proposes "a matching scheme to smoothly connect kinematic regions where different scaling behaviors with jet energy are observed"—indicating that IR structure fundamentally changes across the phase space. Similarly, [AG-2025.07-995] maps a "transition from the perturbative QCD regime at relatively large angles to the non-perturbative region at small angles," pinpointing IR sensitivity to a characteristic scale (~2.3 GeV for quark jets) rather than a universal culprit.

Failures beyond soft-collinear limits

However, angular correlation problems extend beyond IR-dominated regimes. [AG-2025.06-1328] tackles "intermediate region θ₁₂ ∈ (0,π)" in dihadron correlations—a broad swath of phase space—and identifies challenges in evaluating "four-body phase space integrals" and pathological "IBP coefficients [that] can develop divergences" even in regions nominally under perturbative control. This suggests computational and structural obstacles unrelated to pure IR physics.

More strikingly, [AG-2025.07-1515] examines the "back-to-back limit" (seemingly a soft-collinear corner) and finds that even with precision treatment (N⁴LL accuracy and global fits), the data "do not provide meaningful constraints"—implying the problem is not IR sensitivity *per se* but rather that current precision cannot disentangle competing physics in that window.

Bottom line

IR sensitivity explains local failures near soft-collinear thresholds, but angular correlations fail more broadly because of phase-space structure, non-perturbative transitions, and unresolved hadronization dynamics that span "all kinematic regimes" [AG-2025.09-1156].