How does horizon perturbation freezing compare mechanically to standard scalar-field slow-roll stabilization?

Your question asks about a comparison that isn't directly addressed in these preprints. Let me explain what's in the archive and why there's a gap.

The provided papers discuss two related but distinct stabilization mechanisms:

Standard scalar-field slow-roll stabilization is covered in several preprints. The core idea is that when the second slow-roll parameter η remains small and positive, the inflaton field evolves quasi-adiabatically down its potential, and perturbations remain frozen in amplitude once they exit the horizon [AG-2024.05-892]. This works because the equation of motion keeps the field's kinetic energy subdominant relative to the potential energy, suppressing rapid field dynamics.

Sharp trajectory turns and perturbation evolution receive detailed treatment in [AG-2026.03-621], which shows that when the background trajectory turns sharply in field space (violating slow roll), perturbations do *not* simply freeze—they actively evolve through the turn, and this requires careful numerical tracking. Similarly, [AG-2025.07-130] examines ultra-slow-roll (USR) transitions, where the second slow-roll parameter becomes large and negative; here again, perturbations grow rather than freeze, and the dynamics are captured by different "branches" of Hamilton-Jacobi theory rather than a single slow-roll attractor.

The mechanical difference is intuitive: slow roll works by making the potential energy dominant and friction (Hubble drag) strong, naturally suppressing mode growth. Sharp turns and USR phases *weaken* that friction, allowing the field's trajectory curvature to couple to perturbations and amplify them. However, the preprints don't directly compare these as competing stabilization schemes—they treat them as different regimes requiring distinct mathematical tools.

The provided archive doesn't contain a head-to-head mechanical comparison of "horizon perturbation freezing" as a named stabilization technique versus slow-roll suppression.