How does the Gauss-Bonnet coupling strength need to vary with black hole mass to produce scalarization?

# How Gauss-Bonnet Coupling Must Vary with Black Hole Mass for Scalarization

This is a subtle question that the archive addresses through several different mechanisms.

The Mass-Dependent Window

The key insight is that scalarization doesn't happen for *all* black hole masses at a given coupling strength—it occurs only within a specific mass window [AG-2025.05-311]. This window exists because the coupling is characterized by a length scale $λ$ [AG-2025.05-311], and deviations from General Relativity become significant only below a certain mass threshold. The practical consequence: LIGO/Virgo's constraints on $λ$ suggest stellar-mass black holes should remain unscalarized, *while* supermassive black holes could scalarize if the coupling is tuned appropriately [AG-2025.05-311]. This narrow mass window is what makes supermassive black holes special targets for observing scalarization effects.

Two Distinct Mechanisms

Curvature-induced scalarization depends on how strongly the scalar field couples to spacetime curvature (parameterized through the Gauss-Bonnet invariant). The coupling strength must be large enough that black hole curvature destabilizes the trivial scalar solution, but this effect is relatively insensitive to mass—even rapidly rotating (hence highly curved) black holes exhibit comparable scalar charges to their static counterparts [AG-2025.03-712].

Nonlinear scalarization works differently: the coupling function itself (e.g., $\zeta(\phi) = \alpha\phi^4 - \beta\phi^8$) must be designed so that Kerr black holes are linearly stable but nonlinearly unstable [AG-2025.09-463, AG-2025.03-677]. In this case, both the spin and the coupling constants constrain the parameter space available for scalarization [AG-2025.03-677].

The Effective Field Theory Constraint

There's a subtlety: below a minimum black hole mass, the perturbation equations for scalar Gauss-Bonnet black holes lose hyperbolicity, signaling that the effective field theory breaks down [AG-2026.04-239]. This minimum mass depends on the coupling function parameters—with the right choice, you can push it arbitrarily small, but only without gaining larger deviations from General Relativity [AG-2026.04-239].

Importantly, attempts to construct a scenario where *only* supermassive black holes scalarize (while stellar-mass ones don't) face a theoretical obstacle: such mass-selective scalarization does not naturally emerge from standard effective field theory with a single additional scalar field [AG-2025.06-675].

The archive doesn't provide a single formula for how coupling strength must scale with mass, but rather shows that the interplay between the coupling function's form, the length scale it introduces, and the black hole's mass and spin determines the scalarization phase space. The most promising observational window remains supermassive black hole binaries detected through pulsar timing arrays [AG-2025.05-311].