Why does MOND's acceleration scale $a_0$ emerge naturally in relativistic versions but not classical MOND?

# Why MOND's acceleration scale *a₀* emerges naturally in relativistic versions

The classical MOND description [AG-2025.01-283] treats $a_0$ as a *phenomenological parameter* — a number you measure from galaxies and then plug in by hand. It's analogous to discovering that friction always appears in mechanics but having no theory for where it comes from.

Relativistic MOND theories, by contrast, can derive $a_0$ from deeper symmetry principles, making it *emergent* rather than imposed.

The de Sitter symmetry mechanism

In one relativistic approach [AG-2026.01-159], the MOND acceleration scale arises from a *de Sitter radius* selected dynamically in the infrared limit: $a_0 = c^2/(ξ\,\ell_{\rm d\cdots})$. This happens because the deep-MOND regime is conformally invariant under the five-dimensional de Sitter group $SO(4,1)$ — a mathematical symmetry of spacetime structure itself. The theory doesn't declare $a_0$ as fundamental; instead, it emerges from how gravity deforms at long distances in a relativistic setting. Think of it like how the speed of light $c$ isn't *added* to relativity as a mystery constant, but rather emerges from the geometry of spacetime.

Quantum vacuum structure

A separate route invokes quantum effects [AG-2026.02-316]. Here, $a_0$ appears as the scale where local short-time acceleration induces spectral broadening (a generalization of the Unruh effect), grounding MOND in quantum fluctuations rather than classical kinematics alone.

Why classical MOND doesn't naturally produce *a₀*

Classical MOND is purely kinematic — it's an *algebraic relation* saying "acceleration here relates to Newtonian acceleration there" [AG-2025.01-283]. Without a relativistic or quantum action principle, there's no mechanism to fix the one free parameter. It's like Newton's gravitational constant *G*: classical mechanics accepts it as given, but general relativity derives gravity from geometry.

The preprints provided don't fully address *why* relativistic theories specifically prefer this emergence mechanism, but the pattern is clear: when you embed MOND into a relativistic field theory with symmetries (especially conformal or gauge structure), $a_0$ becomes a *consequence* of those symmetries rather than an input.