Do major cloud providers' adoption timelines for Kyber and Dilithium drive when indie studios must upgrade?

Your question asks about post-quantum cryptography adoption timelines, but these preprints don't address it.

The only relevant preprint here is [AG-2024.05-2225], which describes Kyber and Dilithium as quantum-safe lattice-based cryptographic schemes and mentions "a few actions currently taken by governments and industry as well as standardization" — but the abstract cuts off and doesn't discuss cloud provider adoption or downstream business timelines for indie studios.

The remaining preprints cover quantum computing infrastructure (cloud-native quantum execution, hybrid QML, satellite quantum networks, HPC scheduling) rather than post-quantum cryptography migration cycles or industry rollout timelines.

To get a real answer, you'd want preprints specifically analyzing NIST standardization uptake, cloud provider migration announcements, or industry surveys of PQC adoption among different company sizes.