How does confinement inside hadrons prevent us from directly measuring quark radius of curvature?

Your question touches on a subtle but profound issue in quantum chromodynamics (QCD): *confinement makes certain properties of individual quarks fundamentally unobservable*.

The core problem is that quarks cannot exist in isolation [AG-2025.08-709]. Instead, confinement appears to be a geometric property of spacetime itself—the strong nuclear force warps the structure of space around quarks in a way analogous to a black hole's event horizon [AG-2025.08-709]. This means that as you try to measure a quark's trajectory (and thus its "radius of curvature"), you can never actually isolate the quark to observe it directly. Any measurement probe energetic enough to resolve quark-scale distances will simply liberate additional quark-antiquark pairs from the vacuum, which immediately re-confine into new hadrons—you never get a clean view of the individual quark's path.

Beyond this fundamental obstruction, there's a conceptual problem with how we even define "size" for hadrons. The various "radii" appearing in the literature—charge radius, mass radius, mechanical radius—do *not* have simple geometric meanings [AG-2024.08-1293, AG-2026.03-1472]. Each reflects a different aspect of internal structure (electric charge distribution, stress distribution, magnetic properties), rather than a single physical boundary [AG-2025.03-1447]. A quark's radius of curvature would require similar clarification: curved according to which observable? There is no invariant, frame-independent "size" to measure.

The provided preprints don't directly address quark radius of curvature as a specific question—that term doesn't appear in the archive.