Antigravity Q&A
How does the state-dependent field redefinition needed for matching stress tensors affect causality or locality in the dual picture?
Answered by claude-haiku-4-5 · 28 April 2026
Answer
Your question asks about a technical tension in holographic or duality frameworks: when matching stress tensors between two descriptions requires state-dependent field redefinitions, do those redefinitions jeopardize causality or locality in the dual picture?
The provided preprints don't directly address "state-dependent field redefinitions in a dual picture"—that phrasing suggests a specific AdS/CFT or similar holographic scenario that isn't covered here. However, several papers do illuminate related causality and locality questions in quantum field theory that bear on your concern:
On stress tensors and locality:
The two identical papers [AG-2025.08-649] and [AG-2025.08-648] show that when a stress-energy tensor exists *as a local field* in curved spacetime quantum field theory, the "local time-slice property" and implementability of local isometries follow as consequences. This suggests that locality is preserved when the stress tensor itself obeys locality constraints—though these papers work in a forward-evolution framework rather than addressing dual-picture redefinitions.
On causality under field redefinitions:
[AG-2024.12-648] studies how effective descriptions (acoustic metrics) can appear to violate causality in some observer frames while preserving it in others. The key insight: observer-dependent apparent violations of causality (complex energies, ill-posed Cauchy problems) are frame artifacts, not fundamental. This hints that state-dependent redefinitions *might* introduce apparent causal issues that vanish when properly interpreted in the full theory.
On relativistic locality in QFT:
[AG-2024.12-903] demonstrates that quantum field theory satisfies relativistic locality—meaning what happens in a region determines what happens in its future light-cone—under the right choice of state assignments. The choice *matters*, but locality is preserved if you're careful about how states are assigned to regions.
The preprints don't directly answer whether state-dependent field redefinitions in a dual picture preserve causality and locality.
Sources · 8
- 63%math-phAn analytic approach to the stress energy tensor in quantum field theoryAG-2025.08-649
- 63%math-phAn analytic approach to the stress energy tensor in quantum field theoryAG-2025.08-648
- 61%gr-qcThe Hadamard condition on a Cauchy surface and the renormalized stress-energy tensorAG-2024.06-040
- 61%gr-qcCausality and Stability from Acoustic GeometryAG-2024.12-648
- 59%quant-phState updates and useful qubits in relativistic quantum informationAG-2025.06-596
- 59%quant-phCausality in relativistic quantum interactions without mediatorsAG-2024.12-489
- 59%hep-thRoot-$T\bar{T}$ Deformations on Causal Self-Dual Electrodynamic TheoriesAG-2025.04-1091
- 59%quant-phRelativistic Locality from Electromagnetism to Quantum Field TheoryAG-2024.12-903
Keep exploring
- Does the observer-dependent framing in acoustic metrics suggest state-dependent redefinitions are merely apparent artifacts?
- How do local isometries constrain which field redefinitions preserve stress-tensor locality without spoiling it?
- What if matching stress tensors across dual descriptions requires *non-local* state assignments that still respect relativistic locality?
This is a research aid — not a peer review. Verify sources before citing.