Could modified gravity theories produce the same gravitational potential depth as dark matter models through different spacetime geometries?

Yes, modified gravity theories can in principle produce gravitational potential distributions that mimic dark matter's effects, but the challenge lies in whether they do so *consistently* across different scales and observations.

The Core Idea

The question hinges on a deep equivalence: both dark matter and modified gravity alter how spacetime curves in response to matter. In general relativity with dark matter, the "missing mass" creates extra gravitational potential depth. In modified gravity, different geometric rules (how curvature relates to matter) can create similar potential wells without invoking new particles. The question is whether a single modified theory can match observations everywhere.

What the Archive Shows

Several modified gravity approaches attempt this equivalence:

Teleparallel and non-Riemannian geometries can reproduce cosmic acceleration and some local phenomena [AG-2025.11-174], but face a critical problem: they struggle to satisfy Solar System tests simultaneously. The predicted deviation in light-bending (the Eddington parameter) violates observational bounds, suggesting that geometries departing from Einstein's framework buy success at one scale at the cost of failure at another [AG-2025.11-174].

Energy-momentum squared gravity modifies the Lagrangian to include $T_{μν}T^{μν}$ terms and *does* produce flat galactic rotation curves naturally—the signature effect of dark matter—through purely geometric effects [AG-2025.01-706]. Similarly, conformal gravity adds a linear potential term alongside Newtonian gravity that mimics dark matter's influence on spiral and elliptical galaxy kinematics [AG-2025.06-260].

Variable Newton's constant approaches yield galactic metrics with flat rotation curves as vacuum solutions (no dark matter needed), though the light-bending prediction differs measurably from both general relativity and dark matter models [AG-2025.05-483].

The Critical Limitation

Here's the catch: modified gravity theories that match galactic observations often produce *different* relationships between matter density growth and spacetime geometry distortion than general relativity predicts [AG-2025.06-066]. A direct observational test—comparing how density fluctuations grow versus how the Weyl potential (the sum of spatial and temporal metric distortions) evolves—currently shows no deviation from general relativity [AG-2025.06-066], constraining such modifications to within 33% across cosmic history.

Even more troublingly, there is a fundamental *degeneracy*: models with a dark force (additional interactions in dark matter) can mimic modified gravity signatures, and vice versa [AG-2024.04-266]. Disentangling them requires new observational handles, such as gravitational redshift measurements [AG-2024.04-266], which future surveys like the Square Kilometre Array may provide.

Bottom Line

Modified gravity geometries *can* locally produce the same potential depth as dark matter through different rules. But a single geometric theory struggles to satisfy observations across galactic, Solar System, and cosmological scales simultaneously. The archive suggests the real question is not whether it's possible in principle, but whether any unified theory exists that works everywhere—and current evidence leans toward no.