Why would geometric vacancies in fractal spacetime avoid the instability problems that plague negative-mass stars?

This is an excellent and sophisticated question that gets at a real tension in the literature. Let me unpack what these papers suggest.

The core problem: Negative-mass stars are generically unstable [AG-2024.07-629]. Any model where you try to assemble a star-like object from negative-mass material runs into dynamical instabilities—roughly speaking, the repulsive nature of negative mass makes such configurations collapse or explode rather than settle into equilibrium.

Why vacancies in fractal spacetime might sidestep this:

The key insight in [AG-2024.01-439] is that you're not actually dealing with negative-mass *matter*. Instead, you have a geometric reinterpretation: vacancies (holes) in the fractal lattice of spacetime itself reduce the local "substratum density." This is crucial. The paper uses a Menger Sponge—imagine spacetime riddled with voids at all scales—and shows that to an embedded observer, this vacancy-dominated geometry *resembles* a negative-mass Schwarzschild metric in its external effects, without requiring you to assemble negative-mass stellar material.

Why does this help with stability? The instability problems that plague negative-mass stars [AG-2024.07-629] arise because negative-mass *matter* has a stress-energy tensor that violates classical energy conditions and creates feedback loops that destabilize equilibrium. But if your "repulsive" gravity emerges from *missing* spacetime density rather than from exotic matter, you've sidestepped the stress-energy problem entirely. You're not trying to hold up a structure against its own negative pressure; you're describing a geometric deficit.

That said, [AG-2024.01-439] itself acknowledges "stability challenges"—the paper is transparent that this is a heuristic construction, not a microscopic derivation from a fundamental theory. The vacancy interpretation may evade the instability theorems of classical negative-mass stars, but it doesn't automatically guarantee stability; that would require detailed analysis of perturbations in the fractal geometry itself, which the paper doesn't fully provide.

Related approaches in the archive:

Papers like [AG-2024.06-485] ("Attractive voids") explore a related idea: purely geometric effects that create *apparent* gravitational attraction without matter. And [AG-2025.10-198] shows that even negative-mass singularities can be stable under certain conditions—hinting that negative-mass scenarios aren't universally forbidden, only generically unstable under standard assumptions.

The deeper lesson: the instability of negative-mass stars relies on the *matter* having an equation of state. Geometry, being more abstract, may have more freedom.