What specific experimental results have challenged the standard quantum mechanics-relativity incompatibility assumption?

Your question asks about experimental results that have *challenged* the incompatibility assumption—but the preprints provided actually show the opposite pattern.

Most of these papers either reinforce the incompatibility or explore theoretical workarounds, rather than reporting experiments that undermine it.

Here's what the archive actually contains:

On the core incompatibility itself: [AG-2025.03-807] makes a historical-philosophical argument that quantum mechanics' verified predictions are "flatly incompatible" with Einstein's relativistic spacetime structure—but this is an interpretive essay, not a new experimental result.

On Lorentz invariance and quantum theory: [AG-2024.02-2011] discusses the difficulty of formulating Lorentz-invariant extensions of theories like Bohmian mechanics, but frames this as an *unsolved problem*, not a resolved challenge to incompatibility.

On testing alternatives: [AG-2024.04-1862] tested whether quantum correlations show transient deviations when measured faster than light could propagate between entangled particles. The result? "No difference... [is] found"—meaning quantum mechanics held up, not that incompatibility was challenged. [AG-2024.03-1766] placed tight experimental bounds on spacetime diffusion in hybrid classical-quantum theories, effectively constraining (not supporting) alternatives to standard quantum mechanics.

The other papers ([AG-2025.06-413], [AG-2025.09-1289], [AG-2024.05-1598], [AG-2024.06-2248]) explore conceptual frameworks or measurement paradoxes, but none report experiments that directly challenge the quantum-relativity incompatibility assumption.

The archive does not appear to contain experimental results that have challenged the standard incompatibility assumption.