Does the infinite Hilbert space issue disappear if you ignore photons and focus only on quarks?

No, the infinities don't disappear if you focus only on quarks instead of photons—you're still working in the same mathematical framework, and the problem goes deeper than which particles you include.

Here's why: The "infinite Hilbert space issue" isn't really about photons or quarks specifically. It's a foundational question about whether the infinite-dimensional Hilbert space—the abstract mathematical arena where all quantum states live—is the right tool for physics at all. Some critics argue that the infinite dimensionality creates paradoxes (like finite expectation values becoming infinite under basis changes). However, recent work shows these arguments are flawed [AG-2025.01-382]. The purported contradictions turn on mathematical errors, not a genuine physical problem.

The key insight is that *any* quantum system—whether you're describing a single quark, a photon, or a composite hadron—still requires a Hilbert space formalism in the standard framework. Removing photons from your description doesn't change the underlying mathematics; it just restricts which physical degrees of freedom you're tracking. You still face the same choice: either Hilbert spaces are a physically legitimate description of quantum states (as the conventional view holds), or they're not—and that debate applies across particle types.

That said, there are alternative approaches being explored. Some theorists are investigating how quantum mechanics might *emerge* from deeper pre-geometric quantum fields [AG-2026.02-031], in which case the Hilbert space would be more of a useful approximation than a fundamental structure. And others are reconsidering the role of the Hilbert space in quantum field theory, distinguishing between the interaction region (governed by path integrals) and asymptotic states (encoded in Hilbert spaces) [AG-2025.07-1045]. But these don't selectively apply to quarks and not photons—they would reshape the entire framework.