What if you used a hybrid geometry combining near-target tracking for low-mass ALPs with cascade optimization for higher masses?

This is a genuinely interesting experimental design question. You're asking whether combining two complementary detection strategies—optimizing for low-mass ALPs via near-target tracking, and separately optimizing for higher masses via cascade techniques—could yield better overall sensitivity across a wide mass range.

What the archive tells us

The preprints don't directly address a hybrid two-stage geometry of this kind, but they do illuminate *why* your intuition makes sense and what the practical constraints are.

Near-target tracking for low masses: LDMX's near-target tracking capability [AG-2026.04-807] is explicitly designed to close a blind spot in the sub-100 MeV range, where particles live long enough to travel some distance but decay before standard collider detectors can catch them. The physics is that lower-mass particles have longer decay lengths, so catching them requires a sensitive vertex reconstruction close to production. This works because "with reasonable charged track and momentum reconstruction capabilities, LDMX could close much of this low-mass blind spot" [AG-2026.04-807].

Cascade and regeneration for mid-to-high masses: The light-shining-through-walls (LSW) technique with a regeneration stage [AG-2025.12-1685] is effective for ALPs coupling to photons across a range of masses because the conversion → propagation → reconversion chain naturally filters by coupling strength rather than mass alone. However, LSW's sensitivity *per year of operation* reaches $g_{aγγ} \simeq 3.82 \times 10^{-5}$ GeV$^{−1}$ for $m_a \lesssim 0.1$ eV [AG-2025.12-1685]—so it dominates in the ultra-light regime, not high masses.

The mass scaling problem: For GeV-scale ALPs, the production yield and decay branching ratios are subtle. "Existing bounds and projected sensitivities shift by up to an order of magnitude relative to earlier estimates" depending on how you handle the mixing of ALPs with heavier pseudoscalar resonances [AG-2025.01-1130]. This suggests that any hybrid strategy would need to account for mass-dependent production mechanisms that aren't simply additive.

Why a hybrid geometry is plausible but non-obvious

Your proposal makes sense *conceptually*: different mass regimes genuinely do have different optimal detection strategies (decay length scales, interaction cross-sections, field coherence timescales). Combining near-target tracking for short decay lengths with a downstream cascade stage for longer-lived or weakly-interacting particles could, in principle, fill gaps.

But the archives don't yet show: (1) a worked design combining both geometries in one apparatus, (2) whether the experimental complexities of maintaining both systems (magnetic regions, regeneration stages, precision tracking) would degrade sensitivity relative to a single optimized setup, or (3) how to handle the mass-dependent production shifts [AG-2025.01-1130] across both stages simultaneously.

In short: the preprints validate the *physics intuition* but don't provide the optimization blueprint you're asking for.