Why does the two-phase learning process prioritize learning symmetries over noise during compression?

This is a great question, but the provided preprints don't directly address your specific question about the two-phase learning process prioritizing symmetries over noise.

That said, I can point to what *is* in the archive on related themes:

The two-phase learning model [AG-2025.04-1127] proposes that networks first fit curves rapidly, then enter a slower "compression" phase driven by mutual information reduction between hidden layers and input. This compression is described as "a principled form of forgetting, critical for generalization" — analogous to renormalization in physics. Importantly, this second phase is *not actively optimized* by standard training algorithms.

Several other papers show that symmetries genuinely help learning. For instance, VAEs trained on data with symmetries self-organize their latent spaces to compress along symmetry-respecting directions [AG-2025.04-1387], and networks can be explicitly guided to learn symmetries faster via constrained optimization [AG-2024.04-1683]. Meanwhile, symmetry *breaking* under noise is a real problem in quantum machine learning [AG-2024.01-1688], showing that preserving symmetry is non-trivial in the presence of noise.

The deeper mechanism — *why* the compression phase would prioritize symmetries over noise — likely hinges on a principle like Occam's razor: symmetries offer compact descriptions of data structure, while noise is high-dimensional and uncompressible. But the archive doesn't spell this out explicitly in the context of two-phase learning.