How do production angular distributions for ALPs versus HNLs differ mechanistically at the same beam energy?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

Angular Distributions: ALPs vs HNLs at the Same Beam Energy The mechanistic difference comes down to how each particle couples to the Standard Model — and this fundamentally shapes their production angles. The Coupling Difference ALPs couple through dimension five (or higher) operators to gauge bosons — photons, gluons, and the electroweak bosons [AG 2025.10 1635]. This means they radiate off or mix with virtual gauge fields in the collision. HNLs, by contrast, couple through their mixing with active neutrinos , which involves the weak force and lepton number violation [AG 2026.01 1345]. What This Means for Angular Distributions At a given beam energy, these different couplings produce distinct kinematic signatures: 1. ALP production from gauge mediated processes (like gluon fusion at hadron colliders or photon fusion at lepton colliders) tends to populate forward and backward directions preferentially, because the coupling to gauge bosons is "universal" — it doesn't single out particular directions relative to the collision axis [AG 2025.10 1635], [AG 2025.07 1152]. The off shell mediator nature of the ALP means the angular distribution reflects the underlying gauge boson polarization. 2. HNL production depends on whether the parent particle (like a W or Z boson, or a lighter vector mediator) is on shell or off shell. When produced via Drell Yan mechanisms at fixed target experiments, HNLs inherit the angular structure of their parent boson's decay — typically more isotropic or peaked at wider angles [AG 2026.01 1345]. When produced via the ALP portal (where ALPs decay to HNL pairs), the distribution reflects both the ALP's gauge mediated production and its subsequent decay. Why It Matters This difference in angular signatures is experimentally crucial: it allows you to separate ALP dominated events from HNL dominated events using detector acceptance and angular cuts, even when they have overlapping mass ranges and beam energies [AG 2024.07 1383]. The provided preprints don't contain a detailed side by side calculation of angular distributions for ALPs versus HNLs at identical beam energy; they focus instead on total cross sections and mass/coupling sensitivities.