How does entanglement growth in axion networks scale compared to other quantum field theories?

Looking at your question about entanglement growth in axion networks versus other quantum field theories—this is a subtle comparison that requires separating what the archive actually tells us.

The archive provides direct evidence on axion string *network evolution* (not entanglement growth), and separate studies of entanglement scaling in *different* QFTs, but doesn't directly compare entanglement growth between axion systems and other theories.

Here's what we do know:

Axion networks scale toward an attractor:

Axion string networks evolve toward a stable fixed point with dimensionless length density $\hat{\zeta}_{\text{w},*} \approx 1.220$ and velocity $\hat{v}_* \approx 0.57$, with growth slowing logarithmically as equilibrium approaches [AG-2024.10-1401]. This describes the *classical* evolution of topological defects, not quantum entanglement dynamics.

Entanglement behavior depends strongly on field theory details:

In contrast, entanglement growth in interacting QFTs shows rich structure. In the $\lambda\phi^4$ scalar theory, interactions *suppress* entanglement growth compared to free fields, while in the Schwinger model (fermions coupled to gauge fields) enhanced inter-particle correlations partly compensate for suppressed particle production [AG-2026.01-684]. Nonlocal field theories generically generate volume-law entanglement entropy—a dramatic difference from area-law behavior in local theories [AG-2025.11-851].

The key insight: axion network dynamics and quantum entanglement growth probe different physics. Network scaling is driven by classical string dynamics and energy dissipation; entanglement growth is driven by quantum correlations built up during particle creation or field interactions.

The provided preprints don't directly compare entanglement growth in axion networks to other QFTs.