Why does the Radial Acceleration Relationship differ between galaxies and clusters if gravity follows a single modified law?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

Why the RAR Differs Between Galaxies and Clusters The short answer: a single modified law of gravity can in principle apply everywhere, but galaxies and clusters operate in different regimes of that law—much like how water behaves differently as ice, liquid, or steam under the same physics. The Core Problem The Radial Acceleration Relationship (RAR)—a tight correlation between the acceleration you'd calculate from visible matter alone and the actual acceleration needed to explain orbital motions—works beautifully for galaxies [AG 2026.02 201]. But when you extend the same modified gravity theories to galaxy clusters, they fail to account for the observed dynamics [AG 2026.02 201]. This looks like a fundamental inconsistency: how can one law of gravity work in one context but not another? Why They Differ The key insight comes from recent work developing a generalized field equation. The modified GRAS/AQUAL framework, when extended carefully, reveals that the difference between galactic and cluster RARs emerges naturally from a single underlying equation with just one free parameter [AG 2026.02 201]. In other words, the same law does apply, but galaxies and clusters probe different parts of how gravity transitions from Newtonian to modified regimes. Think of it like this: the transition from everyday gravity to "exotic" behavior happens at a characteristic acceleration scale. Galaxies mostly live in that transition zone where the modification matters strongly. Clusters, being much more massive, experience different average conditions—their gravity is weaker in some sense, or their internal dynamics are dominated by a different balance of forces. The single law predicts different observable relationships in each regime, just as the same thermodynamic equations predict different phase transitions depending on pressure and temperature. Related Tensions This resolution connects to a broader puzzle: modified gravity theories like MOND face tight constraints from the Solar System. There's an 8.7σ tension between fitting the galactic RAR and simultaneously satisfying Solar System quadrupole measurements—the sharpness of the transition required by galaxies doesn't match what the Solar System allows [AG 2024.01 118]. This suggests the interpolating function (the mathematical shape of how gravity changes) may need refinement, though relaxing uncertainties in stellar mass to light ratios can ease the conflict. Other candidate theories—Verlinde's emergent gravity, Rastall gravity, and Weyl tensor modifications—each attempt to explain the RAR across scales with different mechanisms [AG 2024.09 423], [AG 2026.01 494], [AG 2026.04 061], though none has yet achieved universal acceptance. The provided preprints don't fully detail why clusters specifically break naive modified gravity predictions—that requires understanding cluster scale physics in more depth than these abstracts supply.