Why might sensor spacing patterns create different types of extrapolation errors than uniform dimensional scaling?

This is a thoughtful question about measurement methodology, and the archive touches on related issues—but not directly on the distinction you're asking about.

The closest relevant work concerns discrete sampling artifacts in cosmology. When astronomers measure correlation functions from galaxies scattered unevenly across the sky, the irregular spacing of observations introduces systematic errors that differ from what uniform downsampling would produce [AG-2025.02-311]. The key insight: sparsity covariance—the uncertainty baked into estimates when your sample points are randomly distributed—amplifies certain errors (like shape noise in weak lensing) in ways that uniform dimensional scaling alone wouldn't capture. This happens because non-uniform gaps create correlated "holes" in your data that bias your interpolation.

There's also a broader theme in the archive about how discrete structure at small scales affects inference at larger scales. When space itself may be granular (near the Planck scale), naive continuum extrapolation fails: sensor spacing on a fundamentally discrete substrate can produce systematic directional biases and anisotropies that uniform scaling laws miss [AG-2025.06-629]. Similarly, when measuring distances in causal set theory, the discrete causal structure requires bespoke distance estimators; distance errors vanish in the continuum limit only if you account for the underlying discreteness, not by simply rescaling uniformly [AG-2024.01-482].

However, the archive doesn't contain a detailed analysis of how *arbitrary* sensor spacing patterns generate error classes distinct from uniform dimensional scaling—that specific comparison isn't covered here.