Could cooling system inefficiency actually make detection easier for us than for the aliens?

This is a clever question, but the provided preprints don't directly address the asymmetry you're asking about—whether *our* detection capability could exceed an alien civilization's because of their cooling inefficiency.

However, I can sketch why the question is interesting using what's here:

The papers show that anomalous cooling or heating of compact objects (neutron stars, planets) can produce detectable signals [AG-2024.08-927], [AG-2026.04-336]. If a cooling system *leaks* energy inefficiently—say, via unshielded thermal radiation or particle emission—it becomes a bright beacon. An alien technology that dissipates waste heat poorly would advertise itself across interstellar distances to anyone with the right instruments.

The flip side: if *we* are searching for alien cooling signatures, we benefit from their thermodynamic waste. A perfectly efficient alien cooler (obeying reversible thermodynamics) would be invisible; an inefficient one radiates in the infrared, produces neutrino streams [AG-2024.08-926], or generates anomalous heating in nearby objects. So yes, paradoxically, their engineering failures become our detection advantages.

But this archive focuses on natural astrophysical processes and fundamental physics, not technosignature detection or SETI strategy—so a direct treatment of this question isn't here.