How do galaxy orbital timescales in clusters compare to the timescales assumed in modified gravity field equations?

# Galaxy Orbital Timescales vs. Modified Gravity Field Equations

This is a subtle question that touches on a real tension in modified gravity theories.

The Cluster Timescale Problem

Galaxy orbital periods in clusters—typically hundreds of millions to billions of years—create a diagnostic challenge for modified gravity. When you apply classical modified gravity theories like AQUAL or MOND to clusters, they fail dramatically: [AG-2026.02-201] notes that "when applied to galaxy clusters they do not explain the bulk of the missing mass," even though these same theories work beautifully for individual galaxy rotation curves. This mismatch hints that the timescale assumptions baked into the field equations may be inconsistent across scales.

The core issue is how quickly modified gravity effects should operate. Field equations typically assume quasi-static equilibrium—that systems have had enough time to adjust to the gravitational law in question. But in a cluster, you have tens or hundreds of orbiting galaxies with crossing times of ~1 Gyr. If the effective gravitational "law of nature" changes between galactic and cluster scales (as AQUAL/MOND suggest), then galaxies might not have had time to dynamically equilibrate to cluster-scale physics [AG-2026.02-201].

Modified Field Equations and Timescale Dependence

A direct response to this tension comes from [AG-2026.02-201], which develops a unified GRAS/AQUAL field equation with a single free parameter that *can* be extended to clusters without invoking dark matter. The crucial insight is that the field equation itself contains different regimes: it behaves one way for galactic dynamics (where it matches observations) and potentially another for cluster-scale physics. The paper shows these differences manifest in comparing the Radial Acceleration Relationship (RAR) measured in galaxies versus clusters—suggesting the timescale for equilibration depends on system size.

Why This Matters

If modified gravity field equations must be rescaled or retuned at different dynamical timescales, it weakens their appeal as fundamental laws. Alternative approaches like Modification of Newtonian Gravity (MONG) sidestep this by modifying the Poisson equation directly and checking consistency against observable timescales: [AG-2025.04-324] shows that particle velocities in the hot intracluster medium, derived from temperature profiles and balanced against modified gravitational forces, match observations—a test that inherently respects the *actual* dynamical timescales of cluster gas.

However, the provided preprints don't directly measure or compare the orbital decay timescale in clusters against predictions from any specific modified field equation, so a more quantitative answer would require additional literature.